Have been curious about this but haven't had time to do the research.
<> You are right. There is not much similarity with Owen either. One <> similarity is that they are trying within the space they are occupying <> to set up new social relations that embody their ideals . Propaganda <> of the deed. The Utopian socialists also tried to set up alternative <> societies in sync with their ideals. But OWS is not following any <> blueprints for an ideal socialist society. <> <> Cheers, ken <> <> Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html <> Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html <> <> <> ________________________________ <> From: "from_alamut at yahoo.com" <from_alamut at yahoo.com> <> To: "lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org" <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> <> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:00:09 PM <> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Anarchism in The Weekly Standard <> <> Anarchism never had a fascination with Utopian socialist schemes. <> <> peace <> <> Jim Davis <> Ozark Bioregion, USA, Planet Gaia <> <> check out my books at: <> http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/from_alamut <> <> <> <>>________________________________ <>> From: ken hanly <northsunm at yahoo.com> <>>To: "lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org" <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> <>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:17 PM <>>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Anarchism in The Weekly Standard <>> <>> The article was a good read and there do seem to be family <>> resemblances between utopian socialism and some in the OWS groups. <>> However the part about Fourier is rather ridiculous. There is none of <>> the detailed blueprints for future society associated with what is <>> happening as far as I can glean from a long distance away! <>> <>>Cheers, ken <>> <>>Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html <>>Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html <>> <>> <>>________________________________ <>>From: nathan tankus <somekindofheterodox at gmail.com> <>>To: Lbo Talk Lbo Talk <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> <>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:50:09 AM <>>Subject: [lbo-talk] Anarchism in The Weekly Standard <>> <>>i read the weekly standard every day so i read this when they posted <>>it. the entire framing was completely stupid but you're correct, the <>>writer does have a decent understanding of the underlying history. <>> <>>-- <>>-Nathan Tankus <>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <>>___________________________________ <>>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk <>>___________________________________ <>>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk <>> <>> <>> <> ___________________________________ <> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk <> ___________________________________ <> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk <>
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)