SA: It's not about the substantive argument, which is totally defensible. It's the way the issue is turned into this endless psychodrama.
I'm having some trouble construing this.
(a) What is the antecedent of "it" in " It's not about..."?
(b) What part of what substantive argument is sustainable?
(c) What's the antecedent of "it" in "It's the way..."
(d) What is the "issue," and who turns it into drama in this thread?
Carrol