[WS:] Actually, it is a quite favorable review. Sometimes reading the stuff that one comments on helps one avoid being left way out in the left field.
Wojtek
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> I haven't read this post, but I presume it is a strongly negative critique
> of Occupy all Street. But I do not believe that Mao's proposition (Oppose
> Whatever Our Enmies Support) is true in this case. It's true that the NYT is
> fairly consistent in its strong support of the might of Capital, but it can
> misjudge, so I reject Charles's argument that we should oppose the Occupy
> 'movement simply because the NYT thinks it has positive features.
> Nevertheless, the editorial should be interpreted by the people occupying
> Wall Street as a sort of "Heads Up," a caution to consider their actions
> carefully.
>
> Carrol
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>