But if you do not understand let me repeat - you state that mistrust is created when people who disagree turn around and violate an agreement by speaking for the movement. I replied by saying this this is standard behavior in identity politics groups and internet discussion groups (including this one, I may add). I then asked how do want to overcome this tendency and built trust, which as you claim is essential to build solidarity among diversity and disagreement.
Is it sufficiently clear, or do I need to drop some names to further clarify it?
Wojtek
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:05 AM, shag carpet bomb <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
> your sentences make no grammatical sense. You might want to read Alan
> Tourraine on the Solidarity movement if you don't understand.
>
>> Shag: " If you aren't trustworthy, if people with
>> whom you disagree and have arguments with in a working group turn
>> around and violate an argreement by speaking for the movement,"
>>
>> [WS:] Sounds like a standard practice of pomo identity politics and
>> internet-based discourse. How do you want to built trust to overcome
>> it?
>>
>> Wojtek
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>
>
> --
> http://cleandraws.com
> Wear Clean Draws
> ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>