What's wrong with that? If it's a question of one side seeming to be not actually involved, just slinging platitudes from the sidelines, I'd dispute that. I think Chris Maisano is the most involved out of anyone on the panel.
What the video might not have shown is that Doug and company's arguments were received *much *better by the audience and like I said before, I'm pretty sure free CUNY will have wider resonance in the general public than pioneering new and creative ways to fuck.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Eric Beck <ersatzdog at gmail.com> wrote:
> And what Carrol says here was exactly the difference: One
> "side" was trying to describe what's going on there, what the
> occupation is doing, while the other was talking about what it isn't
> doing, how it was failing to enact the politics that side wants to
> see.
>