> W/r/t "unpaid reproductive labor and unimaginable exploitation" to what
> exactly are you referring?
I'm talking about women working in the household and returns on foreign-invested capital that reached something like eight dollars for each one put forward.
> And while world war may have led to full employment, immediately after the
> end of the Second World War the Nat'l Ass'n of Manufacturers launched a
> fierce and well-funded attack against labor.
I don't understand this logic, which Doug uses frequently: Because the bourgeois is against it, it's necessarily a threat to them? I don't see it. I reckon they are just as incapable of knowing what's good for them as the rest of us are.