Who's the anonymous person who was quoted. Maybe it's there that we need to look for an agenda instead of just Ashley?
lbo8325 wrote: <> <> Disclosure: She's a friend of someone I've done some organising work <> with. I don't have anything invested in her, and from what I know she <> can be very stubborn and confrontational, but her commitments are <> reasonable and she's courageous. The intervention at the meeting <> seemed misjudged, but far from the "shouting" it was described as <> being. In general, I'd rather deal with someone who's openly obnoxious <> than someone who spreads anonymous "feedback" (and I say that in full <> contrition at having done so myself). The former is a pain in the ass; <> the latter is toxic. I suppose a degree of protectiveness and even <> suspicion are to be expected, and will probably increase as tensions <> ratchet up, but whispering campaigns do a lot more real damage than <> hard-headedness; they prefigure the gulag. <> <> ___________________________________ <> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk <>
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)