On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> There used to be a radio show in Bloomington entitled Problems & Solutions
> --4 hours every afternoon. Originally it was the sort of show where people
> call in to ask how to clean a blouse or to give away a cat. But it often
> developed quite different subjects. One day the host was talking about
> makign "This Land" our national anthem. I phoned in and said, "You know,
> don't you, that Guthrie was a communist." "Oh no, he said, Guthrie was a
> patriot." "Exactly," I said. Any how, our local Bircher was soon on the
> phone, giving all the details about all those Communist musicians in NYC.
> She had a long list, but the onlyname I remember now is Leonard Bernstein.
> The curious thing about the Red Hunt, even in less nutty forms, was that it
> depended on the target being a "secret" communist. So before they could bait
> an open communist they had to somehow show that he/she denied being a
> communist. The same woman was one of the witnesses before the legislative
> committee that had subpoenaed me in 1970 -- both funny & sort of pathetic.
> All she could talk about (the subject was post-Kent State events at ISU) was
> being able to smell the marijuana blocks away from campus.
>
> Carol
>
>
> On 9/30/2011 9:01 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>> I'd remembered that Goldwater shunned the JBS as nuts, so I refreshed my
>> memory on all this. WFB has an interesting memoir on all of it:
>>
>> http://www.commentarymagazine.**com/article/goldwater-the-**
>> john-birch-society-and-me/<http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/goldwater-the-john-birch-society-and-me/>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Time was given to the John Birch Society lasting through lunch, and the
>> subject came up again the next morning. We resolved that conservative
>> leaders should do something about the John Birch Society. An allocation of
>> responsibilities crystallized.
>>
>> Goldwater would seek out an opportunity to dissociate himself from the
>> “findings” of the Society’s leader, without, however, casting any aspersions
>> on the Society itself. I, in National Review and in my other writing, would
>> continue to expose Welch and his thinking to scorn and derision. “You know
>> how to do that,” said Jay Hall.
>>
>> I volunteered to go further. Unless Welch himself disowned his operative
>> fallacy,National Review would oppose any support for the society.
>>
>> “How would you define the Birch fallacy?” Jay Hall asked.
>>
>> “The fallacy,” I said, “is the assumption that you can infer subjective
>> intention from objective consequence: we lost China to the Communists,
>> therefore the President of the United States and the Secretary of State
>> wished China to go to the Communists.”
>>
>> “I like that,” Goldwater said.
>>
>> What would Russell Kirk do? He was straightforward. “Me? I’ll just say, if
>> anybody gets around to asking me, that the guy is loony and should be put
>> away.”
>>
>> ...
>> ______________________________**_____
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/**mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_____
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/**mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk>
>