the person to whom your concern is directed (not sure who you were writing to) are only going to care if they have some stake in only ever engaging in marxist arguments.
i can't think of anyone who only makes marxist arguments, not even on this list. there's just too much other interesting stuff going on that marx didn't address or was confused about to be able to stick to only that which marx's text support.
At 11:19 AM 4/14/2012, Carrol Cox wrote:
>Ian is of course completely correct -- as I realized the second I clicked
>the send button. "Non" is not just preferable; it is correct while "anti" is
>flatly incorrect.
>
>Carrol
>
>===================
>
>There is a legitimate distinction between non-Marxist and anti-Marxist
>arguments regarding profits, investment, coercion, causality etc. Just
>as there are legitimate critiques of the same that eschew moral
>discourse altogether.
>
>Ian
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)