Anyhow its not nearly so hard to imagine as you insist. What is meant by 'the rule of law' is that the words mean what judges interpret them to mean.
Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas
>Indeed. In fact it is impossible even in fantasy to imagine what "the rule
>of law" would constitute. Law equals WORDS, and it is in principle and in
>practice impossible for the same sentence to mean (exactly) the same either
>for any two persons or for the same person on two different occasions. A
>text is dumb until it is given meaning by an interpreter. It cannot speak
>for itself.
>
>Carrol
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk