[lbo-talk] A view from the left on gun control

Marv Gandall marvgand at gmail.com
Mon Dec 24 19:44:48 PST 2012


Richard Seymour, who writes the influential blog Lenin's Tomb and is a sometimes contributor to LBO, had a similar debate with Alex Cockburn of the Nation in 2007 in the wake of the Virginia Tech shooting spree by Seung-Hui Cho which claimed 32 dead and 17 wounded. Cockburn was critical of the gun control lobby then in much the same way that Jordan and Dennis are now, though they may not agree with Cockburn's alternative, echoing the NRA, of armed schoolteachers and guards in the schools. Seymour succinctly put the case for gun control from a left perspective: "The number of guns and access to them is contributing to widespread social misery - not originating it, but compounding it, and making its effects more deadly. ..The left's attitude to gun control has to be situation-specific, and pragmatic. In some societies, restricting guns would make precious little difference, since the murder rate is already quite low. In the US, the opposite obtains." I don't know if Richard still holds these views today but subsequent events have since given his comments even greater force.

* * *

"...you have this immense industry that thrives off social breakdown, whose impact on American society is almost uniformly negative: I speak of the weapons industry. When they're not producing the means by which Iraqis are gunned down in their cars or houses, they are encouraging homeowners and middle class suburb dwellers to fancy themselves either inheritors of the American Revolution, or hardass homesteaders, wild west heroes, war veterans or something else appropriately ridiculous. Grandad therefore has an arsenal which one can loot from to shoot up the local school. On top of that, you create a demand for property-driven criminal activity, create the supply of propertyless criminals to carry much of it out, and then you have an industry that is desperate to sell its product, with the reasonable expectation that they will be used in criminal transactions. In the United States, between 1965 and 2000, more than a million Americans were killed by firearm, and almost the entirety of increases in the murder rate in the early 1990s was provided by lethal semi-automatic weapons. Aside from that, many of the murders are committed within the household, and those households with at least one gun (over half of American households today) have been more likely to experience a homicide for that reason. The facts suggest that the circulation of firearms in America is far too free, but under the rubric of states rights, many states opt out of obligations proposed by, for instance, the Brady Bill, which simply proposed a five day waiting period, (and even that no longer obtains). If the system was designed to succeed in reducing especially violent crime, then a waiting period and a register of gun ownership would surely be a minimum expectation.

"So, this is why Cockburn's contrarian swipe at the 'anti-gun lobby' comes rather cheaply...Invoking the posse, or the popular militia, he actually calls for teachers and hall monitors to be armed as an alternative to cops on campus and SWAT teams. It is true that the campus cops did not evacuate the campus as they should have when the first two bodies were discovered, and that the SWAT teams did not intervene to stop the killings. It is also true that they are given to torturing students from time to time. Yet, hall monitors are as likely to plug an overactive student as a dangerous assassin. Teachers are as likely to shoot their own students as a mass killer on the loose. It's curious, since Cockburn is so dyspeptic about the absolute failure of the institution and its teaching staff to respond to the warning signs apparently so evident in Cho, that he thinks they can be trusted with brandishing pistols. This isn't a society on the brink of a democratic revolutionary upheaval. It is a society experiencing serious disintegration and polarisation, and it isn't sensible to proliferate weapons in the school system. The number of guns and access to them is contributing to widespread social misery - not originating it, but compounding it, and making its effects more deadly. ..The left's attitude to gun control has to be situation-specific, and pragmatic. In some societies, restricting guns would make precious little difference, since the murder rate is already quite low. In the US, the opposite obtains."

http://www.leninology.com/2007/04/capitalism-gun-crime-and-ideology.html



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list