Paul Krugman, Mr. Japan, mostly agrees with the piece as well, but with a lot of reservation. Link shortly,
-- Ravi
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:15 AM, David Green wrote:
>>
>>> SGS is being referred to frequently in relation to their unemployment figures: http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
>>
>> Very misleading. Williams: "The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers."
>>
>> What happened in 1994 was that a question was added to the survey asking discouraged workers if they'd looked for a job at any time in the past year. That strikes me as not unreasonable. If you're just sitting around for months on end saying, "Shit, sure would like a job," without actually trying to find one, should you really be counted as "discouraged"? Since 1994, the person who hasn't looked for a job at all in the last year is categorized as "not in labor force - want job." A number that is published every month in the employment release.
>>
>> The Shadow graph has the broadest unemployment rate, which includes these wishful souls, at something like 6-7 points above the BLS's broad U-6 rate. But the "not in labor force - want job" category is less than 3% of the civilian population. I don't know how that gets multiplied by two or more.
>>
>> Doug
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>
> --
> Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow
> Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598
> Static page: http://www.nohairshirts.com
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk