your views may be correct. don't know. i didn't read what you wrote once i realized you hadn't understood what i was talking about. i'd like to keep it to the topic I was interested in, so perhaps it's a forked thread that others might be interested in?
At 08:31 PM 1/22/2012, Carrol Cox wrote:
>Shag wrote: " so I'd say that your critique is probably more relevant to
>Robin because he is very interested in hierarchies of social status seems to
>me."
>------
>
>I'm running out of energy for the day, but a quick note on this. I would
>have no disagreement at all with anything in this post on personal relations
>and power. But they are relevant at an entirel ------
>
>I'm running out of energy for the day, but a quick note on this. I would
>have no disagreement at all with anything in this post on personal relations
>and power. But they are relevant at an entirely different 'level' of
>practice. They are the day to day problems of any active organization, and I
>have seen them destroy a number of groups. But they neither contradict nor
>support the argument in my post.
>
>Carrol
>
>This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
>http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)