what i was trying to understand was why max seemed to be making a distinction where there are charters and then there are for profit management companies. i am not sure how a for profit charter school company is different from a for profit school management company.
At 09:22 PM 6/21/2012, ken hanly wrote:
> What about the charter management companies that are bidding to take
> over the Muskegon schools. I assume they are for profit companies or are
> the non-profit too?
>
>Cheers, ken
>
>
>Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html
>Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:04:07 PM
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Historical moment: the first full privatization of
>a U.S. public school district
>
>
>On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:56 PM, shag carpet bomb wrote:
>
> > charters aren't for profit?
>
>No there are a lot of public and nonprofit charters.
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)