I was TA a very long time ago, early 60s before there were any regulations (ADA) and the general field was in a quasi-experimental phase of sorting out kids.
>My wife works in an ED
> program in a low income school (by choice, since she prefers not to
> deal with rich people who feel entitled) and says that most of her
> students' problems originate in their households and communities
> (usually some kind of abuse or neglect), but a typical school response
> to those problems is "more discipline." Teachers who try a
> non-confrontational, non-disciplinarian approach with "problem kids"
> are often seen as wimps by their peers and administrators, and often
> can result in negative evaluations.
The wimp approach worked for me. What it really means is non-reactive. Don't get embroiled in the anger or nastiness or whatever. There was still discipline, but of a passive sort, like sitting in a special chair...equivalent to a `time out'. The kids I was dealing with were 9, 10, maybe 11. They were approximately 2an and 3rd grade at best.
CG