Sent from my iPad
On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:45 PM, 123hop at comcast.net wrote:
> Most people who write today cannot make a living from their writing, which is why they teach or have other day jobs.
>
> In the soviet union and satellites, there was total support for writers/poets/artists, but there was a price to pay: adherence to the party line. I'd also say that it distorted the artistic vision somewhat as the artists in question had little or no other work experience and tended to have contempt for manual labor.
>
> A universal basic income, or adequate pay that could be saved to take off a year or two to write, or fellowships for artists would be a great thing. Trollope might have had the discipline to turn out 5000 words a day, waking at dawn, and then working a full time job; but his work was somewhat formulaic and became remunerative enough for him to quit the day job.
>
> J
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Bill Bartlett <billbartlett at aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> Marxists will recall that
>> lesson about value being determined by the socially-necessary cost of
>> production - well the socially-necessary cost of production is now virtually
>> nothing.
>
> It works equally well in neoclassical price theory: the marginal cost
> of producing an ebook is approaching zero. (I learned this from a
> pirated Mankiw a few years ago.)
>
> It's an interesting moment in history. If things go on the way they
> are, the entire publishing industry could become a loss-leader for
> people who make their money elsewhere. Maybe in a few years the only
> novels left will be those published by the Cato Institute.
>
> Otherwise, I think the future of literature will have to be guaranteed
> by social benefits. I think a Universal Basic Income would massively
> increase the production of progressive nonfiction. (Imagine what Marx
> would have written if he'd had a guaranteed income, plus instant
> access to every book ever published.)
>
> Ebookcollective adopt an absurdly moralistic posture on all this. They
> are the ebook version of the stereotype vegan, who thinks the whole
> world would be able to live off dumpster-diving if only they were
> really committed.
>
> A data point on ebook piracy: based on the forums on the websites I
> frequent, a lot of the "customers" are third-world students
> (particularly from South Asia and Africa) who are unable to afford the
> mandatory textbooks. Textbooks are a racket and I fully endorse their
> piracy.
>
> Cheers
>
> CWS
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk