> This is not the main point here. The judicial system is slanted against
> reform, period. Anyone, or rather any employer, can use it to this end.
>
> Wojtek
> On Sep 17, 2012 5:51 PM, "Dennis Claxton" <ddclaxton at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
In this particular case not only is the executive seeking an injunction,
he is doing so on the basis of a recently passed law. I don't see how you
blame that primarily on the judiciary. In general, I don't disagree that
the judiciary is the most reactionary branch of government. But this is a
case where the judiciary is being asked for an injunction allowing the
executive to enforce a bad law the legislature has recently passed. So a
really bad example.
> >
> > >[WS:] Those who bitch about Obama and DP take note. It is the
> > >judicial system - not the presidency or even legislative bodies - that
> > >is the main obstacle to instituting any meaningful progressive reforms
> > >in this country.
> >
> >
> > Did you take note of the headline? Who is the "Chicago Mayor" using the
> > judicial system?
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/ Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com