[lbo-talk] No rights for Tsarnaev?

Bill Bartlett william7 at aapt.net.au
Sun Apr 21 23:26:44 PDT 2013


At 10:54 PM -0700 21/4/13, Chuck Grimes wrote:
>I couldn't find an explicit story, but I assume this:
>
>http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/04/21/178254784/miranda-rights-and-tsarnaev-ashcroft-says-u-s-move-is-the-right-one
>
>No Miranda. Hmm. This may turn out to be a big mistake, or a big
>victory for the Reich. If they can use this case as a precedent,
>they can pretty much annul most civil rights for anybody charged
>under terrorism as a special universe where there are no laws.
>
>There is probably zero to massively negative popular feeling toward
>anybody with a name like Tsarnaev. OTOH, maybe some body like Mike
>Tigar can pull off a miracle. Doubtful. Just imagine the evil mind
>that set up the civil rights lefties to a must win case or else.
>
>Where is the public safety exception for a guy with near critical
>injuries in a hospital who can't speak (intubated?), chained to his
>bed, and is no doubt under 24/7 armed guards? His mere existance is
>an existential threat to greatest military power on the planet. I am
>sure...

The "right to remain silent" seems to be a right observed more in the breach than the observance.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/the-confessions/

That was a documentary screened on SBS here last night. There seem to be an endless parade of these kind of cases of innocent people getting convicted. There was another documentary screened here last week about an innocent man who was hanged in Texas, despite there being overwhelming evidence he was innocent. (in fact the weight of evidence left no doubt there was not even a crime, he was executed over an accidental fire which killed his children.) The common thread that runs through these cases seems to be that public opinion over-rides actual evidence. People are convicted, or otherwise, for political reasons, not on the basis of evidence. If the public doesn't like you, if they want you punished or even killed, that is likely to happen regardless of the evidence.

That being the case, this Tsarnaev fellow is dead meat.

Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list