[lbo-talk] No rights for Tsarnaev?

Jim Farmelant farmelantj at juno.com
Mon Apr 22 08:49:12 PDT 2013


Carrol, I am afraid that you misread Chuck's message. He wrote "the Reich," not "the right." Presumably, by Reich, Chuck was including the Obama Administration, which I think we can all agree here is one of the greatest threats to basic civil liberties that we have seen in a long time.

Jim Farmelant http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant http://www.foxymath.com Learn or Review Basic Math

---------- Original Message ---------- From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] No rights for Tsarnaev? Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:07:25 -0500

Chuck Grimes
> No Miranda. Hmm. This may turn out to be a big mistake, or a big victory
for
> the Reich.

The last three words make nonsense of this.

The threat does NOT come from "the right" ; the threat comes from Obama, Clinton, et al.

A focus on the "right" relegates the writer to the ranks of the mere onlooker in the bleachers.

Carrol

____________________________________________________________ How to Sleep Like a Rock Obey this one natural trick to fall asleep and stay asleep all night. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/51755c58d1ad85c586f35st01vuc



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list