the shirt business doesn't make sense with a hoodie, does it. they never lay flat against your skin when you wear it all big and baggie.
At 01:56 PM 7/16/2013, Jordan Hayes wrote:
>Wojtek writes:
>
>>First of all, there were no eyewitnesses there, people reported
>>what they overheard and thought was going on.
>
>Do you just make stuff up or repeat what you heard on a street corner?
>
>No one saw *the entire fight* but Jonathan Good testified in the trial
>that he saw M on top of Z, punching him ("pretty much throwing down
>blows") shortly before the shot was fired. Jeannee Manalo testified that
>she saw a man on top of another man, swinging his arms ("The one on top
>was moving" she said, while making a punch-like gesture). The question
>has arisen whether it wasn't Z on top of M (it was dark, fog-of-war and
>all that), which could have made a big difference: if Z was on top, he
>would have been "winning" the fight, and thus the shooting would be
>murder. But the defense also produced evidence that the shot fired was in
>contact with M's shirt, but not his skin, which strongly suggests that it
>was M on top with his shirt hanging down; if reversed, the powder burns on
>the shirt and skin would have been different than they were.
>
>If you can't be bothered to even read about the case, I can't be bothered
>to correct you any more.
>
>/jordan
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)