[lbo-talk] Fwd: c

[Wojtek S]

may be yes, may be not.  One way to argue it is not is that information
collected by NSA does not pertain to something going on within the home,
but rather outside it (i.e. connections and transmission towers).  This
distinction seemed crucial in Kyllo's case, so if someone want to challenge
it he would argue that surveillance collected information from public
places not private homes.  In any case, it will be interesting to see how
courts will rule on this.

wojtek

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jordan Hayes <jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com>wrote:


> FLIR, and that is even along the way to probable cause: if FLIR is
> unconstitutional, NSA wholesale wiretapping surely is.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 21:09, socialismorbarbarism <
> socialismorbarbarism at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > s there
> > *any* recent ruling granting or extending 4th amendment rights to a
> > situation involving technologies that came into wide use in the 20th C
> and
> > beyond?
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

-- 
Wojtek

"An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."