On 06/02/2014, at 2:57 AM, Michael Smith <mjs at smithbowen.net> wrote:
> Agreed about the silliness of 'nonviolence' but I'm not sure that putting it
> in the context of 'privilege' tells us much about what's wrong with it, or
> where it comes from.
Would you care to explain why you believe 'nonviolence' is silly? What's wrong with the strategy of non-violence as you see it?