>Well, people need to be engaged in creating their lives, and that involves
>work.
>
>I don't know that I'd call that "full employment," but still, work is a real
>issue.
>
>========
>
>Full Employment has nothing to do with work or the need for work. It makes
>sense only on the irrational basis that isolated inndividuals must labor or
>starve.
>
>Production does not depend on everyone being engaged in paid employment.
>
>Prior to about 12000 BP no one worked, but people got along fine for some
>200 thousand years.
>
>Carrol
Who's the author lately who's made the argument that corporations purposefully pursued policies to keep us working 40+ hr weeks? Reason being: they were afraid of what would happen if we had more free time on our hands.