> On Jan 30, 2016, at 12:50 PM, James Creegan <turbulo at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> Marv Gandall asked:
>
>
> Frankly, if someone could explain to me the immediate practical implications of these conflicting crisis theories, I?d be grateful. Otherwise, the debate is mainly scholastic.
>
> ********************
>
> To listen to someone like Andrew Kliman, the political implications are no less than reform v. revolution. If one argues that underconsumption is the cause of the crisis, then Keynesian consumption-boosting government policies are a possible remedy. If, on the other hand, the FROP is the cause, there is no remedy outside the abolition of capitalism itself. This is not my view, just one I have heard stated.
For some reason, Jim, your emails are coming in late to my inbox. This one just arrived. Can you check with the NSA to see if a surveillance glitch might be the cause?