Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Sat, 30 Jan, 2016 at 9:59 pm, Carrol Cox<cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote: It is highly doubtful that Marx held on to the FROP theory -- mentioned only in K3 -- the first volume to be written & never revised. The unavoidable tyranny of capitalism is commodity fetishism (which is _not_ a belief or a feeling or a fantasy but an objective reality of capitalist production; its political implication is that workers mutually oppress themselves by working.
Carrol
-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of James Creegan Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 2:51 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] the next recession
Marv Gandall asked:
Frankly, if someone could explain to me the immediate practical implications of these conflicting crisis theories, I?d be grateful. Otherwise, the debate is mainly scholastic.
********************
To listen to someone like Andrew Kliman, the political implications are no less than reform v. revolution. If one argues that underconsumption is the cause of the crisis, then Keynesian consumption-boosting government policies are a possible remedy. If, on the other hand, the FROP is the cause, there is no remedy outside the abolition of capitalism itself. This is not my view, just one I have heard stated.
Jim ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk