<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/opinion/sunday/donald-trump-groper-in-chi ef.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinio n-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-le ft-region> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/opinion/sunday/donald-trump-groper-in-chie f.html
D.J.T. did it again and men of this country at the very least have suddenly realized that they too might be gropers in chief one way or another. After all, sexual psychology will not lie about sinners' instincts, controllable or not. Even caterwauls bother us as sounds too loutish and sour to pass them off as a joke.
The difference between D.J.T. and other presidents is that his groping happened prior to taking office and the others "showed a sense of entitlement toward young women" after becoming presidents. And none of those "other senior men" (J.F.K. and W.J.C.) lost their jobs by wreaking vengeance for wronging young women. A case in point is H.R.C. vehemently defended her husband's extra-marital affairs in the White House. She was relentless in stigmatizing women her husband pawed over as tramps and sluts. Why does one critique the two presidential candidates with double standards and few cares about? Besides, WikiLeaks post public notice last night that H.R.C. told the Wall Street luminaries, from whom she received speech fees and political donations in the tens, or even hundreds of millions of dollars, her middle-class-caring policy is not true and she is unsparing in her efforts to work for Wall Street.
Are both gropers in chief, and one by instinct and the other by wangling votes away from voters and walking out? Caveat: the former is a sinner but the latter is a.
Mark Wain