Without the Civil War, slavery would have continued to be constitutional legitimate and operationally legal in many states, although certain blatant human abuses might have been moderated to appease changing social behavioral norms to make slavery a structural part of the economy and a more benign institution. It one compares social attitude and debate on black slavery with those on the legalization of white slavery, a reasonable scenario might been constructed on what would have happen without the Civil War. Paul Henry Rosenberg wrote:
> Brett Knowlton wrote:
> >
> > Paul Rosenberg wrote (in regard to Apartheid in South Africa):
> > >We should have simply invaded and overthrown the government.
> >
> > This is a frighteningly cavalier attitude, assuming you were being serious.
>
> It was a cavalier expression, perhaps. In keeping with the context in
> this forum. The underlying attitude is quite another thing. We were
> willing to make ourselves military allies WITH South Africa, why
> shouldn't we have been making ourselves military allies AGAINST South
> Africa?
>
> Of course, we all know that wouldn't have been necessary. A really
> serious economic blockade could have brought them to their knees quite
> swiftly.
>
> > Do you think we should go around the globe, toppling all the bad guys?
>
> I didn't say we should do it alone, old chap. But, yes, I think that
> sounds like a capital idea. South Africa's gone, so let's begin with
> Alan Greenspan!
>
> But, seriously, you must realize that South Africa was at the time a
> unique case, incomparable to any other.
>
> --
> Paul Rosenberg
> Reason and Democracy
> rad at gte.net
>
> "Let's put the information BACK into the information age!"