Yes, including everyone is part of the point. For insurance, you want to spread the costs of risks as thinly as possible over the maximum number of people. Second, only a unitary system (or perhaps a handful of large, regional ones) will have the means to restrain the growth of costs, which is currently untenable. (it's medicare which causes the long-run budget projections to 'blow up,' not Social Security).
A national system wouldn't have any necessary implications for patents, though one might suspect that the same political environment giving rise to a national system would be inclined to reduce the excessive returns to investment in patented drugs.
>
> Not to mention all those patriotic oldsters rooting
> out fraud on medical
> bills. What about a medical corp for health pros
> willing to serve in
> return for educational benefits. Institute the
There's a bit of that now and could be more, with or without a national system.
> promise of a fair and
> equitable system, and the process will come. I'm
> convinced the problems other countries have is partially
predicated by the
> great American debacle. Something for their black-hearts to
shoot for.
Cheers,
Max