Incivility

Sam Pawlett epawlett at uniserve.com
Wed Jan 13 07:40:40 PST 1999


Its very simple. Do not engage in name calling and personal attacks.( I'm not exempting myself from this criticism.) Name calling and personal attacks serve no purpose whatsoever. If you strongly disagree with someone's intellectual position/arguments attack the arguments and not the person. Of course, when someone attacks your intellectual position you're bound to take it a little personally but that goes with the territory. One has to learn to seperate being attacked intellectually and being attacked personally. Speaking for myself, if someone disagrees with what I say or the manner in which I say it, I would rather they take 5 minutes and explain why instead of calling me an idiot.That way, I know where I can improve for next time. Constructive criticism and thoughtful disagreement are always welcome, name calling isn't. The question of personal attacks is most important for those who have professional reputations to uphold. I would suggest that one can refute personal slander campaigns without engaging in them oneself. There are enough stalinist slander campaigns coming from the right wing, the left need not engage in them. Things would be quite dreary if everyone agreed with one another. It would not be healthy if everyone agreed with each other.'Bout all I have to say. Of course, there is a distinction between name calling and proper identification.....

Sam Pawlett



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list