Women and Lists Re: Solidarity & "Humanitarian" Imperialism (was Re: Yoshie's dearthoffemale contributors)
Max Sawicky
sawicky at epinet.org
Sun Mar 19 09:53:38 PST 2000
Please read the entire subject line. It tells a tale. We (marxism, lbo,
pen-l, and L-I) simply cannot keep a thread on women going. Humanitarian
Imperialism is a vital subject, and I've had much to say about it in the
past and will in the future. But I think the quick mutation into something
else of threads on women is a pretty good synecdoche for the status on the
left (in practice and theory) of the "woman question."
Carrol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is there some place where women keep such threads
going? It doesn't seem to be FEMECON-L, which was
barely alive when I was last there.
There are probably various ways male behavior on
these lists could be improved, but I have to wonder
how relevant that is.
For instance, there's a list for african-economists.
It has almost no political discussion, and not much
traffic in general. Mostly professional stuff and
a smattering of academic questions.
I have to think this all speaks to the narrow appeal
in the sort of politics or 'discourse' that goes on
here. I happen to enjoy it myself, but I'm odd.
And so are most of you.
mbs
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list