I'll probably get the Labor 2000 fax/flyer on that tomorrow.
Tom
Max Sawicky wrote:
> . . . Say what? I have seen leaps of logic in LBO discussions of electoral
> politics, but this one is up there with the best. Who in their right mind
> thinks that Nader is taking ANY votes from Bush, much less a union vote? If
> there ever was a classic white, middle strata base of support, it is the
> Nader campaign. Leo
>
> I am probably not in my right mind, but I think so.
> If the Democrats were a genuine class-oriented
> party, this would be less so. But unfortunately
> they are far from it, so the Repugs benefit from all
> sorts of leakage. I don't think some migration to Nader
> is implausible on its face.
>
> Leo, I enjoy the way you get everyone all jacked up,
> but I don't have nearly the time to follow all the
> arguments. And I'd like to say the AFT is a fine
> bunch of folks who help to pay my salary, therein
> performing a huge service to Humanity.
>
> mbs