> Oh, I see. If the occupied territories were part of Israel proper, the
> conflict could neutrally be termed a "civil war" and there wouldn't be
> anything more to say about the matter. Silly me for thinking otherwise.
What am I missing? When two groups within a country fight each other, that's called a civil war. When one country invades another country, that's something else. Am I being unfair or legalistic here?
Seth