marxism on wgn-fm

Justin Schwartz jkschw at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 18 18:57:09 PST 2001


Chris, Academic Marxism is the only kind that is left. The mass social movement that called themselves Marxist are gone. The struggle is not gone, and insofar as the (academic) theory is true, which it is to a considerable degree, it correctly describes the struggle, but outside a few backwaters, the only serious social movement that still calls itself Marxist is the Brazilian PT, and its prospects are not so great, given what has happened to every other social movement that has taken the label.

Anyway, there's no percentage in trying to stick worker's movements in Britain or AMerica with the label. It won't adhere. That is why Wright thinks we shouldn't bother with fighting over the label, nobody cares anymore apart from some scholars.

The tradition is chock full of great insight, however, and is worth keeping and learning from because of it. In view of this, it doesn't matter, if it ever did, whether dialectics and value theory are "the core" of Marxism--in fact you picked exactly two of the three bits I would say are most dispensible, but that doesn't matter here--but only which parts of the theory and aspects of the tradition are still valid and useful. --jks


>
>
>
>At 21:20 17/02/01 -0800, you wrote:
>>http://tribapps.tribune.com/rafiles/wgnam/shows/ex720/Audio/marxmr.ram
>>
>>http://www.nd.edu/~remarx/index2.html
>
>
>OK what I got from this was
>
>1. the chairperson saying many people in US universities remain impressed
>by Marx
>
>2.Erik Olin Wright arguing that it is better to talk about the Marxist
>Tradition as a terrain of debate rather than Marxism, and
>
>3.David Ruccio, Editor of Rethinking Marxism, arguing that a core concept
>of marxism is class exploitation.
>
>None of these would of course be sufficient for Lenin.
>
>I did not listen beyond the first 5 minutes and more may have been said,
>but the fear is that this is academic marxism, legal marxism.
>
>Without getting thrown onto the defensive with dogmatically re-stated
>terminology about the "dictatorship of the proletariat", is there not a way
>consistently of bringing forward the question of the enormous disparities
>in power between people of different classes, the self-perpetuating nature
>of these, and the effort required to change these, without hoping that this
>will inevitably involve bloodshed.
>
>For my part I think the residual features of marxism which are
>indispensible but necessarily at a high level of abstraction, are to
>recapture the relevance of
>
>1) a dialectical materialist approach
>
>2) the law of value
>
>Chris Burford
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list