> Leo said:
>
> >But it seems to me that you are also very close to arguing a "right to
> life"
> >position here. Shouldn't a mother have the ability to choose not to bring a
>
> >child into the world with cystic fibrosis, for example? All things being
> >equal, is it not right for a mother to want to spare her children and
> herself
> >pain? To wish a long, full life without undue physical hardship for them?
>
> (Woo, Leo! Were you smiling evilly while typing this one?)
>
> I suppose, all other things being equal, you're right. Buuuuuut . . . all
> things are not equal. Following that logic, one then can conclude that too
> many "unfit" (by any criteria) working-class fetuses is a bad drain on the
> capitalists' pocketbooks as well as on that of their mothers' (with
> predictable results). There never would be "unfit" bourgeois-class fetuses
> since their parents would have enough money to deal with their situation.
> Hmmm. . . I sense a good science-fiction story here.
>
> Todd <smiling evilly>
>
Leo Casey United Federation of Teachers 260 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10010-7272 (212-598-6869)
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has, and it never will. If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters. -- Frederick Douglass --
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20010724/7f230497/attachment.htm>