> > it's communicative ACTION, carrol. please read my 6k post to justin on this
> > matter.
> >
>
>I haven't read complete posts by anyone on this issue. I doubt that I'm
>going to. I haven't completed my re-reading of the Manuscript of
>1857-1861 and I haven't even started on a first reading of the
>Manuscript of 1861-1863. Besides there is a pretty important thread on
>the post-Seattle "Movement" proceding on marxism and rad-green, and I
>doubt that this topic here is ever going to be very close to the top of
>my agenda. I'm just visiting. I was overstating when I suggested the
>whole 20th century concern with communication was a detour, but I was
>only overstating a suspicion I have had for many decades.
>
>Carrol