> >Segregation is the historical reality for disabled persons, and not
> >coincidentally the proliferation of institutions coincides with the
> >rise of capitalism.
> >Marta
>
> That makes sense, but in that case, our argument would be _for_ home
> care necessary for assisted living, directly or indirectly provided
> by the state, & improvement of it for both disabled persons &
> care-giving workers. Clarifying what disabled persons & care-giving
> workers need helps us better than a broad-brush criticism of the
> medical profession tout court.
>
> Yoshie
========
Ah, but we've just displaced the coercion; for we are saying that some
'home' must assume responsibility/liability for the care of disabled
citizens and this becomes problematic if said citizens are nonetheless
capable of exercising their liberty to refuse treatment and shelter.
Ian