judicial tyranny

[Justin Schwartz]

No, Doug, this is not constitutional judicial review. It's straight 
statutory interpretation of the sort that exists even were there is 
parliamentray supremacy. --jks


>
>Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>>So much for federalism.
>
>So much for democracy. This is the price you pay for letting courts
>have enormous power to overturn laws on "constitutional" grounds.
>
>Doug

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com