anthrax

[Ken Hanly]

It is extremely difficult to mount an effective anthrax attack. As I believe
I mentioned in an earlier post, a Canadian expert, who took the Florida
case(s) as clearly an attack, claimed that it demonstrated such attacks were
likely to cause very limited damage. There may already have been several
attempts that have not infected anyone successfully.

    If I got a cold or flu symptoms I would worry more about the hantavirus
than anthrax. It is far more likely you have that and it is just as deadly
if not moreso than anthrax.. Just to cheer u up....:)

Cheers, Ken Hanly

----- Original Message -----
From: "/ dave /" <arouet at winternet.com>
To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: anthrax


> kelley wrote:
>
> > so, it's off to the physician tomorrow. a
> > thrill-a-fuckin-minute.  am i crazy to go to the doctor's tho? normally,
i
> > wouldn't go to a physician for a lousy cold!
>
> To which I say, get thee to the MD tomorrow just to be sure. The third
> case as you probably know by now was also an employee of the tabloid
> newspaper, so whatever it is seems to be very localized. But best not
> take chances.
>
> Besides, the MD's offices are probably going to be busier than usual
> with other concerned individuals very soon, unfortunately...
>
>
> --
>
> /  dave  /