>The evidence for intention in the double-bombing of the Red Cross
>warehouse does _not_ lie in the far-fetchedness of the coincidence. Such
>coincidences are run-of-the-mill, and such unlikely accidents are
>_bound_ to happen. But the evidence presented in the article that Doug
>reposted from the WV as to the basic military strategy of the U.S. in
>respect to air power does suggest that the targeting was deliberate.
>That article makes it _likely_ that non-military targets will be
>targeted.
Speaking of which, CNBC had an item in its headline crawl this morning saying that sources told NBC News that the Red Cross facility was deliberately bombed because the Taliban were allegedly stealing food from it. I haven't heard any more than that, though.
Doug