"Your sick, myopic system of moral calculation manages to evade the fact that even if you made the worst possible case against the American miss! ile attack in Sudan -- and it was simply a pharmaceutical and fertilizer factory that, contrary to the beliefs of American intelligence, had nothing to do with the production of chemical and biological weapons of terror -- supplies are material things that can be replaced, and human lives can not be replaced."
Have they been replaced? Are there credible numbers of Sudanese dead that are connected to the lack of medicine? I ask this unsarcastically. I understand what Leo was gone through (to the degree that I can at this distance); and I think that Noam's first comparative example in his "quick" statement on the terror bombings was weak, especially if there are no known numbers. I'm willing to take this back, of course, provided that those who know the real effect of Clinton's diversionary bombing speak up and provide the evidence we need to make proper comparisons.
DP
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20010913/3efb18cb/attachment.htm>