The post below is somewhat vague.
I assume it refers to the sensible decision of KPFA to exercise editorial judgement and decline to give Mr. Ruppert more airtime? This is hardly censorship, unless you consider all editors to be censors.
And how much on which website is true?
I am not aware of how I could be a shadowy figure behind this decision, unless it refers to my writing on the dangers of conspiracism.
-Chip Berlet
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of C P
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:18 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lists1.panix.com
> Subject: indymedia-copvcia
>
>
> Some people were posting complaints on Indymedia that Chip
> Berlet was a
> shadowy figure behind the decision to not let him on KPFA.
> How much of what he has on his web site is true at all?
> I know people who worked at the NSA who have scary stories.
> http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=164591&group=webcast
>
>