Nathan, I suggest a little more care in your reporting and in your characterizations of principled people on the left and within the labor movement.
TS
Nathan wrote:
>Sure, you may prefer a better labor policy in China, but you seem to defend
it politically as a ncessary evil to defend China's "legitimate national
interests." Yet the irony is that, while you try to play this as a "US
versus China" issue, the US government and the Chinese government were not
opposed on PNTR. They were in agreement.
I'm sorry-- I don't buy "national interests", just the interests of workers and individuals fighting the collaboration of various elites from China to the US in suppressing them. And in the case of PNTR, those elite interests were on the same side in supporting PNTR, while the AFL-CIO was opposing both.
- -- Nathan Newman
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:52:51 -0400 From: "Nathan Newman" <nathan at newman.org> Subject: Re: The Histadrut: Continuity and Change
- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yoshie Furuhashi" <furuhashi.1 at osu.edu>