The rich are different

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Sat Aug 17 02:45:16 PDT 2002


[Pure gossip, but rich gossip, in every sense of the term]

New York Times August 17, 2002

Ex-Adviser Sues Denise Rich, Claiming Breach of Contract

By ALISON LEIGH COWAN

D enise Rich, the sequined socialite and Democratic donor who helped

her ex-husband win a presidential pardon that is still under criminal

investigation, found herself headed for court this week after a former

associate sued her for breach of contract.

On Thursday, the former associate, Herbert Black, the Montreal-based

metals trader and art collector, accused Ms. Rich and her company,

Denise Joy Inc., of breach of contract in a little-noticed lawsuit in

United States District Court for the Southern District.

The lawsuit, brimming with tantalizing details of Ms. Rich's life at

the top, claims that she had agreed to give Mr. Black four months to

produce a buyer for her music business and had asked him for help in

managing her fortune, which was as large as $200 million when her

divorce from Marc Rich became final.

According to the lawsuit, that fortune is now no larger than $125

million because Ms. Rich has not been "watching her personal and other

expenditures carefully."

The lawsuit goes on to describe various ways in which Mr. Black pared

Ms. Rich's annual budget by $8 million.

Cost-saving measures mentioned in the lawsuit include $52,000 in

savings on "dog maintenance" that Mr. Black explained in a telephone

interview had been achieved by giving away two dogs that were too old

to walk and that a hired hand pushed around Central Park in an $8,000

baby carriage.

According to the lawsuit, there was also $200,000 in savings from

reduced outlays to her personal chefs; $210,000 in savings by reducing

the number of her chauffeurs from three to one; $30,000 resulting from

switching her yoga instruction to a "fee for service" arrangement;

$125,000 in savings on flowers for her New York apartment by cutting

down on the number of deliveries when she was not there; and $517,000

in savings that came at the expense of three public relations firms.

One line item on her household budget yielded $250,000 in annual

savings, the lawsuit noted: removing Brad Bowles, Ms. Rich's personal

shopper and party organizer, from her payroll.

Marcia Horowitz, Ms. Rich's spokeswoman at the public relations firm

Rubenstein Associates, said yesterday that Ms. Rich had not seen the

lawsuit and would therefore have no comment. "She has not done

anything wrong and will respond in the appropriate forum in the

courts," Ms. Horowitz said. "It was surprising to her that the media

knew before she did."

Mr. Black, who says that his deal with Ms. Rich guaranteed him

millions in management fees and finder's fees, claims that Ms. Rich

has refused to take his calls or pay him, even though he found two

satisfactory buyers for her half-share of the business. According to

the lawsuit, she had initially told Mr. Black that she would be

thrilled to simply extract the $15 million in capital she had invested

in the business.

"Denise shouldn't take advantage of people," Mr. Black said by

telephone from a yacht off the coast of Italy, recalling how only a

few months ago he and Ms. Rich had celebrated their deal at the Fifth

Avenue restaurant Harry Cipriani. "It's not right."

Ms. Rich and Mr. Black last made news in early 2001 when Ms. Rich

invited Mr. Black to be her escort at a White House gala where she

buttonholed President Bill Clinton about her husband's pending pardon.

According to Mr. Black's lawsuit, however, Ms. Rich had soured on the

relationship. "At one point defendant Rich invited Mr. Black to engage

in a more intimate relationship," the lawsuit states. "However, Mr.

Black declined defendant Rich's invitation. Jaded by Mr. Black's

rebuke, defendant Rich has refused to honor the Finder's Fee

Agreement," and their other financial arrangements, the lawsuit says.

Mr. Black has already turned to the American courts with great

success. He was the lead plaintiff in the civil suit against Sotheby's

and Christie's that netted art collectors a $512 million settlement

because of allegations that the auction houses colluded on commission

rates.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list