those are the only choices? either entertain or nobody listens?
>The point is to get the most radical viewpoints aired to the maximum
>number of people.
>I agree with Doug that you could get many non-leftists listening if the
>presentation
>is entertaining.
of course, people go for entertainment. guess the reason i don't listen to rush limbaugh, it al, is that i just can't stand being entertained.
according to business interests, sex and violence is entertaining and gets lots of attention from the public. maybe pacifica should throw a little of that into the mix.
what's entertaining about most radical viewpoints?
how would you package them?!
>A lot of non-rightwing people listen to talk radio for
>that very reason, but it gives those rightwingers a chance to propagandize
>every day.
is there a left wing equivalent of the entertaining phrase "feminazi"?
why hasn't all that available entertainment converted you and doug, nathan? or has it?
R
>-- Nathan Newman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20020130/e3dec9e3/attachment.htm>