what is the basis for the prohibition of posting full articles? Despite being a lawyer, I have no idea. Especially when the list is not a public list (though if the archives are available to the public, then maybe that changes things) eric
Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote: Chuck Grimes wrote:
>
>Here's a hoax letter from a guy claiming to represent TIME, sent to
>the admin of utah.edu-supported listservs (I presume the same guy
>sent one to Marco). Yoshie
>
>----------
>
>Oh, come on.
>
>There's got to be better than that around. If it's just spam, its no
>threat. There has to be more going here.
That's a very close replica of the one that Marco & I got. I was ready to fold, but Marco questioned his identity and turned out to be right.
Mostly I post the full text of stuff that's short (one screen of text), or available only with subscription; otherwise, a summary or opening paragraph plus URL is best. If the copyright owners complain, we can take it out of the archives.
Doug
--------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20020612/fa2b0b7d/attachment.htm>