More enduring lies

[Max Sawicky]

> . . . And Johns Hopkins, that very, er, kosher NY medical instution
agrees: No doubt about
> it, the bastard had anthrax. No body, no tissue samples, not one measly
> spore, but the irrefutable evidence is there: An Arab, and a terrorist to
> boot. What more does modern science need? For all we know there was a
> mini-nuke in that suitcase.

informational notes:

1.  Hopkins is not in NY.  It's in Baltimore, which I grant you is also
replete
with jews.

2.  This is what the link you supplied says Hopkins *actually* said,
in contrast to your paraphrase:

"Johns Hopkins Biodefense Center experts, who interviewed Tsonas,
said the anthrax diagnosis was the most coherent interpretation of the
available data, the Times said.

"Such a conclusion of course raises the possibility that the hijackers
were handling anthrax and were the perpetrators of the anthrax letter
attacks," it quoted the memorandum as saying."

So basically, you are spinning the tale that the CIA & Mossad
instigated 9-11, either directly or by having prior knowledge and
doing nothing to prevent it.

Thank you for providing an example of 'creepy' in real time.

mbs