We now know that Glaspie presented exactly Washington's stance, and was, in fact, a minor player in a long-standing White House policy of support and accommodation for Iraq. Saddam Hussein may have been given a green light to invade, but April Glaspie can

H. Curtiss Leung hncl at panix.com
Wed Nov 6 17:47:14 PST 2002


Brad writes:


>
> Good God! She said "your border disagreement with Kuwait," not "your
> desire to conquer and annex Kuwait."
>
> Cut the woman some slack...
>

Jeez, relax and scroll down! The article goes on to say

We now know that Glaspie presented exactly Washington's stance,

and was, in fact, a minor player in a long-standing White House

policy of support and accommodation for Iraq. Saddam Hussein may

have been given a green light to invade, but April Glaspie can

hardly be blamed.

I don't think that the rest of the article supports the contention that Saddam Hussein "may have been given a green light to invade," though. What it recounts seems more a tale of incompetence and complacence than duplicity. But duplicity is a lot more exciting, so... -- Curtiss, incompetent but not complacent



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list