> DoreneFC at aol.com wrote:
> >> In a message dated 11/23/02 12:22:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>> furuhashi.1 at osu.edu writes:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> And the indictment charges that Ms. Stewart
>>> allowed interpreter Mohammed Yousry and the sheik to pass messages in
>>> Arabic while she covered the exchange by chattering about
>>> inconsequential matters in English.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks. Sorry to be literal-minded, but I am still trying to figure out
>> exactly what the interpreter is accused of doing.
>>
>> Maybe I can think of some places to look.
>>
>> DoreneC
>> Probably conspiracy or aiding and abetting, that is, same thing as Stewart
>>
My question really is "what is the interpreter accused of doing differently than any other interpreter would do?"
I downloaded the indictment from www.lynnestewart.org and I have at least read it. The indictment and the Special Administrative Measures are clearly an assault on attorney-client privilege, but I see other issues for interpreters as well.
Unless the rest of the list is dying for further commentary about what I read, I would rather continue conversations in private as people are interested.
DoreneC
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20021123/a66b7993/attachment.htm>