Well, since the overthrow of the Taliban/al-Qaeda occupation regime in Afghanistan is the only instance in my life where I've supported US military force, to say that I'm, in essence, a "defender" of US imperialism overall is horseshit, but typical coming from the likes of Carrol, who lends his name to a pro-Milosevic petition, meaning that, assuming he read the thing, he agrees with the stated notion that Milosevic is a Serbian patriot, as are the military forces that operated under his command.
In other words, Carrol's support for this thug is direct, and therefore he approves of the mass graves Milosevic is responsible for. Why else would he publicly lend his name to such a petition?
I do not ideologically back the Bush gang any more than I ideologically backed the Vietnamese Communists, whose overthrow of the Pol Pot regime was the other use of state military force I've supported. But I notice I've never been criticized for holding this latter position. Wonder why . . .
DP