Watch out trying to take anything before King Solomon as based in any solid factual history.
Present theories, as far as I understand, hold that it is more likely that the 'Hebrews' were a local Cananite tribe who usurped political control rather than tribes from further East in Iraq as the Abraham story would tell you.
>It's only relevant bow necause some
> Israelis regard taht asa specific authorization to
> commit genocide against the Pals.
We are talking a minority of a minory which would justify under those reasonings...and most of them justify transfer, expulsion, ethnic cleansing, whatever you would like to call it. It definitely involves violence, and human rights abuse, is vile and repulsive, but genocidal? I am not so sure.
> Others don't need a
> Biblical authorization. Sharon, for example, just is a
> blood soaked mass murdering fascist goon. jks
Sharon definitely is a bloodsoaked, etc. goon and again same critique and question as above...